Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 7 Feb 2013 20:10:38 +0100 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 09/14] pinctrl/abx500: use direct IRQ defines | From | Linus Walleij <> |
| |
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote:
> I don't see myself on cc. Was that intentional?
No, it was my mistake...
> I quite like the idea of this.
Can I take it as an ACK? :-)
> Stephen, > > It doesn't mean the other patch was wrong, it just transfers the math. > > I wouldn't squash it into mine. I like the transition and the possibility to > revert it if there's been some mistake. > > (not to say there is one, but just in case.)
I don't think it's wrong, just different. I changed it after trying to subtract the offset in my head back and forth a few times and screwed up the maths.
Yours, Linus Walleij
| |