[lkml]   [2013]   [Feb]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH -v4 4/5] x86,smp: keep spinlock delay values per hashed spinlock address
On 01/27/2013 08:04 AM, Michel Lespinasse wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Rik van Riel <> wrote:
>> + u32 delay = (ent->hash == hash) ? ent->delay : MIN_SPINLOCK_DELAY;
> I still don't like the reseting of delay to MIN_SPINLOCK_DELAY when
> there is a hash collision.

I've been spending some time looking at this, because I am
not a fan either.

However, it seems to work and I failed to come up with
anything better. Therefore, I have left it as is in the
-v5 patch series.

 \ /
  Last update: 2013-02-07 05:21    [W:0.073 / U:0.492 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site