Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Wed, 06 Feb 2013 15:10:10 -0500 | From | Rik van Riel <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH -v4 4/5] x86,smp: keep spinlock delay values per hashed spinlock address |
| |
On 01/27/2013 08:04 AM, Michel Lespinasse wrote: > On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> wrote: >> + u32 delay = (ent->hash == hash) ? ent->delay : MIN_SPINLOCK_DELAY; > > I still don't like the reseting of delay to MIN_SPINLOCK_DELAY when > there is a hash collision.
I've been spending some time looking at this, because I am not a fan either.
However, it seems to work and I failed to come up with anything better. Therefore, I have left it as is in the -v5 patch series.
|  |