[lkml]   [2013]   [Feb]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH] xfrm: fix handling of XFRM policies mark and mask.
On 13-02-06 09:39 AM, Emmanuel Thierry wrote:

> I think you misread the example !

I did ;->

> Marks are both 1, masks are different.
> This case is more complex than a policy
> with no mark (so mark=0 and mask=0) versus
> a policy with an exact mark (so mark=1 and mask=0xffffffff),
> and i wanted to know if the algorithm would take these kind of cases into account.

Aha. I think this is pushing the envelope a little - are there good use
cases for this?
certainly you could insert with most exact mask first. No such check is
made at the moment.


 \ /
  Last update: 2013-02-06 17:43    [W:0.035 / U:1.576 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site