lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Feb]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH] xfrm: fix handling of XFRM policies mark and mask.
    On 13-02-06 09:39 AM, Emmanuel Thierry wrote:
    >

    > I think you misread the example !

    I did ;->

    > Marks are both 1, masks are different.
    >
    > This case is more complex than a policy
    > with no mark (so mark=0 and mask=0) versus
    > a policy with an exact mark (so mark=1 and mask=0xffffffff),
    > and i wanted to know if the algorithm would take these kind of cases into account.
    >

    Aha. I think this is pushing the envelope a little - are there good use
    cases for this?
    certainly you could insert with most exact mask first. No such check is
    made at the moment.

    cheers,
    jamal


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2013-02-06 17:43    [W:4.011 / U:0.008 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site