lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Feb]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: OMAP2+: SoC name and revision unification
From
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 1:56 AM, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote:
> * Ruslan Bilovol <ruslan.bilovol@ti.com> [130131 11:28]:
>> This is a long story where for each new generation of
>> OMAP we used different approaches for creating
>> strings for SoCs names and revisions that this patch
>> fixes. It makes future exporting of this information
>> to SoC infrastructure easier.
>
> Maybe use name soc_name and soc_rev instead and make
Yes agree, will change in next patchset

> cpu_name and cpu_rev local to the functions?
> That would reduce some churn here.
This is used in second patch in this series

>
> Also this does not apply to my omap-for-v3.9/soc
> branch. Care to update this (and possibly the second one)
> against that?
Yes, I will rebase the patches on top of this branch.

>
> Regards,
>
> Tony


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-02-06 17:01    [W:0.099 / U:0.060 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site