Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Wed, 6 Feb 2013 06:05:09 -0800 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 02/13] workqueue: fix work_busy() | From | Tejun Heo <> |
| |
Hey, Lai.
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 3:42 AM, Lai Jiangshan <eag0628@gmail.com> wrote: >> Given the advisory nature of the function, why do we care? Is it >> needed for later patches? > > Ah, yes.
Please elaborate. Also, things like that - why the patch needs to exist or what the benefits are - really should be in the patch description.
Thanks.
-- tejun
|  |