Messages in this thread | | | From | "Rafael J. Wysocki" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 linux-next 2/2] cpufreq: Convert the cpufreq_driver_lock to use the rcu | Date | Wed, 06 Feb 2013 14:00:30 +0100 |
| |
On Wednesday, February 06, 2013 02:21:11 PM Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 6 February 2013 08:22, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> wrote: > > On 6 February 2013 07:34, Nathan Zimmer <nzimmer@sgi.com> wrote: > >> In general rwlocks are discourged so we are moving it to use the rcu instead. > >> > >> Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> > >> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> > >> Signed-off-by: Nathan Zimmer <nzimmer@sgi.com> > >> --- > >> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 173 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------- > >> 1 file changed, 96 insertions(+), 77 deletions(-) > > > > bleeding-edge got updated again and this patch would have conflicts :) > > > > Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> > > Rafael, > > I have applied them over bleeding-edge after resolving few conflicts. > Please pick them up from: > > Branch: for-rafael > Repo: git://git.linaro.org/people/vireshk/linux.git > http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=people/vireshk/linux.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/for-rafael
That's really helpful, thanks a lot!
Both applied to bleeding-edge.
Thanks, Rafael
-- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
| |