lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Feb]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [Pv-drivers] [PATCH 0/6] VSOCK for Linux upstreaming
Hi Dave,

> >> Instead, what I remember doing was deferring to the feedback these
> >> folks received, stating that ideas that the virtio people had
> >> mentioned should be considered instead.
> >>
> >> http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=135301515818462&w=2
> >
> > I believe Andy replied to Anthony's AF_VMCHANNEL post and the
> > differences between the proposed solutions.
>
> I'd much rather see a hypervisor neutral solution than a hypervisor
> specific one which this certainly is.

We've addressed this with the latest patch series, which I sent earlier
today. vSockets now has support for pluggable transports, of which VMCI
happens to be the first; all transport code is separated out into its
own module. So the core is now hypervisor neutral. Given that, would
you be willing to re-consider it, please? If at all possible, we'd like
to make the current merge window.

Thanks so much!
- Andy


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-02-05 06:21    [W:0.049 / U:0.948 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site