Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 4 Feb 2013 20:13:34 +0100 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [patch] config: fix make kvmconfig |
| |
* Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 10:57:35AM -0800, David Rientjes wrote: > > On Mon, 4 Feb 2013, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > > > arch/x86/Kconfig | 1 + > > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig > > > > index 6979498..f9459b3 100644 > > > > --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig > > > > +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig > > > > @@ -606,6 +606,7 @@ config KVMTOOL_TEST_ENABLE > > > > select NETWORK_FILESYSTEMS > > > > select INET > > > > select EXPERIMENTAL > > > > + select TTY > > > > select SERIAL_8250 > > > > select SERIAL_8250_CONSOLE > > > > select IP_PNP > > > > > > There's no 'config TTY' in the kernel AFAICS. > > > > > > > It's added in linux-next by 4f73bc4dd3e8 ("tty: Added a CONFIG_TTY option > > to allow removal of TTY"). > > > > Adding Greg to the cc to figure out which tree this should be merged > > through. Greg, please find the patch inline. > > Ideally it would go through my tree, but it can't because > KVMTOOL_TEST_ENABLE isn't in my tree :( > > I suggest just adding it to whatever tree this change is in, > it doesn't "hurt" to enable a config option that isn't in the > tree at the moment, right? Or will Kconfig complain about it?
Yeah, that's a good idea - I think Pekka can apply that change just fine to help anyone doing merges - I don't think kconfig treats it as a fatal error.
Thanks,
Ingo
| |