Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 28 Feb 2013 23:47:43 +0000 | From | Matthew Garrett <> | Subject | Re: [GIT PULL] Load keys from signed PE binaries |
| |
On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 12:45:23AM +0100, Jiri Kosina wrote: > On Thu, 28 Feb 2013, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > Sure, if you've been infected before the revocation, you'll still be > > infected. There's not really any good way around that. > > Which is a very substantial difference to normal X509 chain of trust, > isn't it?
If you've loaded an x.509 certificate into the kernel and it's later revoked, any module signed with the key is going to be loadable until it's revoked. I don't see an especially large difference here?
-- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org
| |