lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Feb]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] mfd: palmas: is_palmas_charger needed by multiple drivers
On Tuesday 26 February 2013 06:46 PM, Ian Lartey wrote:
> is_palmas_charger checks for the presence of charging
> functionality in the device
>
> Signed-off-by: Graeme Gregory <gg@slimlogic.co.uk>
> Signed-off-by: Ian Lartey <ian@slimlogic.co.uk>
> ---
> include/linux/mfd/palmas.h | 5 +++++
> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/palmas.h b/include/linux/mfd/palmas.h
> index 3129f9a..98c0567 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mfd/palmas.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mfd/palmas.h
> @@ -26,6 +26,11 @@
> /* The ID_REVISION NUMBERS */
> #define PALMAS_CHIP_OLD_ID 0x0000
> #define PALMAS_CHIP_ID 0xC035
> +#define PALMAS_CHIP_CHARGER_ID 0xC036
> +
> +#define is_palmas(a) (((a) == PALMAS_CHIP_OLD_ID) || \
> + ((a) == PALMAS_CHIP_ID))
> +#define is_palmas_charger(a) ((a) == PALMAS_CHIP_CHARGER_ID)
>

TI says this as TPS80036 and original palma as TPS65913/TPS65914. Not
sure whether palma_charger is correct or not here.

But above change looks good.

Acked-by: Laxman Dewangan<ldewangan@nvidia.com>


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-02-26 15:42    [W:0.032 / U:0.736 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site