Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 26 Feb 2013 19:31:05 +0530 | From | Laxman Dewangan <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] mfd: palmas: is_palmas_charger needed by multiple drivers |
| |
On Tuesday 26 February 2013 06:46 PM, Ian Lartey wrote: > is_palmas_charger checks for the presence of charging > functionality in the device > > Signed-off-by: Graeme Gregory <gg@slimlogic.co.uk> > Signed-off-by: Ian Lartey <ian@slimlogic.co.uk> > --- > include/linux/mfd/palmas.h | 5 +++++ > 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/palmas.h b/include/linux/mfd/palmas.h > index 3129f9a..98c0567 100644 > --- a/include/linux/mfd/palmas.h > +++ b/include/linux/mfd/palmas.h > @@ -26,6 +26,11 @@ > /* The ID_REVISION NUMBERS */ > #define PALMAS_CHIP_OLD_ID 0x0000 > #define PALMAS_CHIP_ID 0xC035 > +#define PALMAS_CHIP_CHARGER_ID 0xC036 > + > +#define is_palmas(a) (((a) == PALMAS_CHIP_OLD_ID) || \ > + ((a) == PALMAS_CHIP_ID)) > +#define is_palmas_charger(a) ((a) == PALMAS_CHIP_CHARGER_ID) >
TI says this as TPS80036 and original palma as TPS65913/TPS65914. Not sure whether palma_charger is correct or not here.
But above change looks good.
Acked-by: Laxman Dewangan<ldewangan@nvidia.com>
| |