Messages in this thread | | | From | Jingoo Han <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 10/11] mfd: tps65010: use devm_request_irq() and devm_kzalloc() | Date | Wed, 20 Feb 2013 17:07:35 +0900 |
| |
On Wednesday, February 20, 2013 4:35 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> -----Original Message----- > From: Dmitry Torokhov [mailto:dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 4:35 PM > To: Jingoo Han > Cc: 'Samuel Ortiz'; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/11] mfd: tps65010: use devm_request_irq() and devm_kzalloc() > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 03:14:05PM +0900, Jingoo Han wrote: > > Use devm_request_irq() and devm_kzalloc() to make cleanup paths > > more simple. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com> > > --- > > drivers/mfd/tps65010.c | 15 +++++---------- > > 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/tps65010.c b/drivers/mfd/tps65010.c > > index da2691f..a5438cc 100644 > > --- a/drivers/mfd/tps65010.c > > +++ b/drivers/mfd/tps65010.c > > @@ -525,11 +525,8 @@ static int __exit tps65010_remove(struct i2c_client *client) > > dev_dbg(&client->dev, "board %s %s err %d\n", > > "teardown", client->name, status); > > } > > - if (client->irq > 0) > > - free_irq(client->irq, tps); > > cancel_delayed_work_sync(&tps->work); > > debugfs_remove(tps->file); > > - kfree(tps); > > the_tps = NULL; > > return 0; > > Nope, again work and IRQ have to be handled in certain order.
Yes, you're right. I will use devm_free_irq()
> > Thanks. > > -- > Dmitry
| |