lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Feb]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/1] tty: atmel_serial_probe(): index of atmel_ports[] fix
On 02/13/2013 12:17 AM, Pawel Wieczorkiewicz wrote:
> From: Pawel Wieczorkiewicz <wpawel@gmail.com>
>
> Index of atmel_ports[ATMEL_MAX_UART] should be smaller
> than ATMEL_MAX_UART.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pawel Wieczorkiewicz <wpawel@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c b/drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c
> index d4a7c24..3f7586a 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c
> @@ -1772,7 +1772,7 @@ static int atmel_serial_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> ret = find_first_zero_bit(&atmel_ports_in_use,
> sizeof(atmel_ports_in_use));
>
> - if (ret > ATMEL_MAX_UART) {
> + if (!(ret < ATMEL_MAX_UART)) {

Good catch, but the result looks weird. Could you just make it ">="?

And find_first_zero_bit + sizeof above is bogus too. The sizeof returns
4 on 32-bit (the driver is run on 32bit machines exlusively AFAICS). So
the highest possible ret in there is 5. Instead atmel_ports_in_use
should be declared using DECLARE_BITMAP(atmel_ports_in_use,
ATMEL_MAX_UART) and the second parameter here then ATMEL_MAX_UART.

Could you fix that too?

--
js
suse labs


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-02-20 16:43    [W:0.048 / U:0.432 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site