Messages in this thread | | | From | Arnd Bergmann <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/4] dw_dmac: introduce generic DMA binding for DT | Date | Wed, 20 Feb 2013 11:10:07 +0000 |
| |
On Wednesday 20 February 2013, Vinod Koul wrote: > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 09:50:25AM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Wednesday 20 February 2013, Vinod Koul wrote: > > > Since there is still churn, would it make sense if I just revert the SPEAr13xx > > > patch (your first patch) and send a pull request to Linus. > > > Since there are no users and not much testing has been done, I think we can push > > > these to 3.10 via arm-soc/slave-dma tree. > > > > > > Gives more testing and usage will go along as well. > > > Since merge window is open, I would like my pull to go soonish and not churn the > > > tree much. > > > > Reverting the SPEAr13xx would definitely help, yes. The reason why I'd also like > > to see the second patch get merged is so that we can do the SPEAr changes in 3.10 > > without having an interdependency between the trees. I tried very hard to > > make the patch have a minimal impact on the non-DT code path to avoid regressions. > Ok, i have applied your revert patch. Will send the PULL to linus by friday.
Ok, thanks.
> > Maybe you can send your tree now with just the revert applied, and then send the > > other one separately next week along with any bug fixes that may have accumulated > > by then? > And then makes sense to send second PULL with fixes accumulated and the second > patch, so that 3.10 is easier for all. think we can compact() patch is second > request as well
Yes, sounds good.
Arnd
| |