[lkml]   [2013]   [Feb]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: RCU?: Scheduling while atomic with 3.4.23-rt33
On Mon, 18 Feb 2013, Tim Sander wrote:
> Here is a transtribed backtrace for easier reading:
> c0010fac t dump_backtrace
> c022c188 T dump_stack
> c022c71c t __schedule_bug
> c022fb28 t __schedule
> c0230644 t rt_spin_lock_slowlock
> c0230ba8 T rt_spin_lock
> c003a9b8 T __wake_up
> c0052a44 t invoke_rcu_callbacks
> c0053764 T rcu_check_callbacks
> c0026060 T update_process_times

That's due to CONFIG_TINY_PREEMPT_RCU=y. That's a known issue, which
has been fixed in 3.6-rt.

Steven, could you backport that to 3.2/3.4 please ?



 \ /
  Last update: 2013-02-18 13:01    [W:0.054 / U:0.092 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site