lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Feb]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
Subject[PATCH v3] cgroup: fix cgroup_rmdir() vs close(eventfd) race
commit 205a872bd6f9a9a09ef035ef1e90185a8245cc58 ("cgroup: fix lockdep
warning for event_control") solved a deadlock by introducing a new
bug.

Move cgrp->event_list to a temporary list doesn't mean you can traverse
this list locklessly, because at the same time cgroup_event_wake() can
be called and remove the event from the list. The result of this race
is disastrous.

We adopt the way how kvm irqfd code implements race-free event removal,
which is now described in the comments in cgroup_event_wake().

v3:
- call eventfd_signal() no matter it's eventfd close or cgroup removal
that removes the cgroup event.

Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name>
Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
---
kernel/cgroup.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/cgroup.c b/kernel/cgroup.c
index 26c071c..621eec1 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup.c
@@ -3833,8 +3833,13 @@ static void cgroup_event_remove(struct work_struct *work)
remove);
struct cgroup *cgrp = event->cgrp;

+ remove_wait_queue(event->wqh, &event->wait);
+
event->cft->unregister_event(cgrp, event->cft, event->eventfd);

+ /* Notify userspace the event is going away. */
+ eventfd_signal(event->eventfd, 1);
+
eventfd_ctx_put(event->eventfd);
kfree(event);
dput(cgrp->dentry);
@@ -3854,15 +3859,25 @@ static int cgroup_event_wake(wait_queue_t *wait, unsigned mode,
unsigned long flags = (unsigned long)key;

if (flags & POLLHUP) {
- __remove_wait_queue(event->wqh, &event->wait);
- spin_lock(&cgrp->event_list_lock);
- list_del_init(&event->list);
- spin_unlock(&cgrp->event_list_lock);
/*
- * We are in atomic context, but cgroup_event_remove() may
- * sleep, so we have to call it in workqueue.
+ * If the event has been detached at cgroup removal, we
+ * can simply return knowing the other side will cleanup
+ * for us.
+ *
+ * We can't race against event freeing since the other
+ * side will require wqh->lock via remove_wait_queue(),
+ * which we hold.
*/
- schedule_work(&event->remove);
+ spin_lock(&cgrp->event_list_lock);
+ if (!list_empty(&event->list)) {
+ list_del_init(&event->list);
+ /*
+ * We are in atomic context, but cgroup_event_remove()
+ * may sleep, so we have to call it in workqueue.
+ */
+ schedule_work(&event->remove);
+ }
+ spin_unlock(&cgrp->event_list_lock);
}

return 0;
@@ -4428,20 +4443,14 @@ static int cgroup_destroy_locked(struct cgroup *cgrp)
/*
* Unregister events and notify userspace.
* Notify userspace about cgroup removing only after rmdir of cgroup
- * directory to avoid race between userspace and kernelspace. Use
- * a temporary list to avoid a deadlock with cgroup_event_wake(). Since
- * cgroup_event_wake() is called with the wait queue head locked,
- * remove_wait_queue() cannot be called while holding event_list_lock.
+ * directory to avoid race between userspace and kernelspace.
*/
spin_lock(&cgrp->event_list_lock);
- list_splice_init(&cgrp->event_list, &tmp_list);
- spin_unlock(&cgrp->event_list_lock);
- list_for_each_entry_safe(event, tmp, &tmp_list, list) {
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(event, tmp, &cgrp->event_list, list) {
list_del_init(&event->list);
- remove_wait_queue(event->wqh, &event->wait);
- eventfd_signal(event->eventfd, 1);
schedule_work(&event->remove);
}
+ spin_unlock(&cgrp->event_list_lock);

return 0;
}
--
1.8.0.2

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-02-18 12:43    [W:0.054 / U:0.288 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site