lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Feb]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [RFC] sched: The removal of idle_balance()
From
Date
On Fri, 2013-02-15 at 01:13 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: 
> I've been working on cleaning up the scheduler a little and I moved the
> call to idle_balance() from directly in the scheduler proper into the
> idle class. Benchmarks (well hackbench) improved slightly as I did this.
> I was adding some more tweaks and running perf stat on the results when
> I made a mistake and notice a drastic change.
>
> My runs looked something like this on my i7 4 core 4 hyperthreads:
>

> 293,801,912,874 cycles # 1.470 GHz ( +- 4.20% ) [100.00%]

> 215,927,081,108 cycles # 2.198 GHz ( +- 5.48% ) [100.00%]

Hm. Maybe set governor to performance?

-Mike



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-02-17 08:21    [W:0.093 / U:0.068 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site