Messages in this thread |  | | Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH] printk: Remove separate printk_sched buffers and use printk buf instead | From | Steven Rostedt <> | Date | Fri, 15 Feb 2013 11:53:37 -0500 |
| |
On Fri, 2013-02-15 at 17:50 +0100, Jan Kara wrote: > On Thu 14-02-13 13:48:11, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > On Tue, 2013-02-12 at 13:22 +0100, Jan Kara wrote: > > > > > > Anyway, what do you guys think about this version? > > > Steven, Andrew, did you have a chance to look at my patches? > > > > Can you resend without being attachments. Patches sent as attachments > > seldom get reviewed. > Well, for example I do review text/plain attachments but that may count > into 'seldom' ;) I'll send them inline. >
The problem is that it makes it difficult to reply with comments. I haven't looked at the patches yet so I may not have comments, but on my email client, commenting attachments means that I need to cut and paste the text to do the comment, which isn't the case for inline patches.
-- Steve
|  |