[lkml]   [2013]   [Feb]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH] printk: Remove separate printk_sched buffers and use printk buf instead
On Fri, 2013-02-15 at 17:50 +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Thu 14-02-13 13:48:11, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Tue, 2013-02-12 at 13:22 +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> >
> > > > Anyway, what do you guys think about this version?
> > > Steven, Andrew, did you have a chance to look at my patches?
> >
> > Can you resend without being attachments. Patches sent as attachments
> > seldom get reviewed.
> Well, for example I do review text/plain attachments but that may count
> into 'seldom' ;) I'll send them inline.

The problem is that it makes it difficult to reply with comments. I
haven't looked at the patches yet so I may not have comments, but on my
email client, commenting attachments means that I need to cut and paste
the text to do the comment, which isn't the case for inline patches.

-- Steve

 \ /
  Last update: 2013-02-15 18:41    [W:0.197 / U:0.412 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site