[lkml]   [2013]   [Feb]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/5] Add P state driver for Intel Core Processors
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 10:08 PM, Dirk Brandewie
<> wrote:
> For the case where both are built-in the load order works my driver uses
> device_initcall() and acpi_cpufreq uses late_initcall().
> For the case where both are a module (which I was sure I tested) you are
> right
> I will have to do something.
> For now I propose to make my driver built-in only while I sort out the right
> solution for the module build. Does this seem reasonable to everyone?

Of-course i am missing something here. Why would anybody want to insert
acpi-cpufreq module when the system supports the pstate driver.

In case they are mutually exclusive, then we can have something like
depends on !ACPI-DRIVER in the kconfig option of pstate driver.

 \ /
  Last update: 2013-02-14 05:21    [W:0.099 / U:1.136 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site