Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 13 Feb 2013 10:39:07 +0100 | From | Samuel Ortiz <> | Subject | Re: [char-misc-next 01/12 v3] mei: Rename mei_device to mei_host |
| |
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 11:09:00PM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Tuesday 12 February 2013, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote: > > > > > > > Please let's find something that makes both hw and Linux happy > > > I still believe it makes sense to use mei_device for what we add to the MEI > > > bus. I'd be fine with mei_bus_device as well, but that would somehow look > > > a bit awkward. Greg, Arnd, any preference ? > > > > "mei_device" works the best for me. Tomas, what you think of as a "MEI > > Device" really is a "MEI Controller", it bridges the difference between > > the PCI bus and your new MEI bus, so you will need to start thinking of > > these things a bit differently now that you have created your own little > > virtual bus. > > Yes, I agree. mei_bus_device would also work as the name for the controller, > but not for the devices attached to it IMO. Tomas, I propose to switch to mei_controller instead of mei_host and keep the mei_device name for the devices we attach to the MEI bus. Does that work for you ?
Cheers, Samuel.
-- Intel Open Source Technology Centre http://oss.intel.com/
| |