Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 12 Feb 2013 19:06:09 +0100 | From | Paolo Bonzini <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/3] nbd: support FLUSH requests |
| |
Il 12/02/2013 18:37, Alex Bligh ha scritto: > For my education, why remove the FUA stuff?
Because I had no way to test it.
>>> > > Hmmm... the underlying storage could be md/dm RAIDs in which case FUA >>> > > should be cheaper than FLUSH. >> > >> > If someone ever wrote a virtio-blk backend that sits directly ontop >> > of the Linux block layer that would be true. > In this case we don't know what the backend is sitting on top of > a-priori. It might be the current nbd server code, but it might > not be.
Do you know of any other NBD server than the "official" one and qemu-nbd?
Paolo
| |