lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Feb]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 22/25] perf: Make EVENT_ATTR global

* Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org> wrote:

> From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> Rename EVENT_ATTR() to PMU_EVENT_ATTR() and make it global so it is
> available to all architectures.
>
> Further to allow architectures flexibility, have PMU_EVENT_ATTR() pass
> in the variable name as a parameter.
>
> Changelog[v2]
> - [Jiri Olsa] No need to define PMU_EVENT_PTR()
>
> Signed-off-by: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Anton Blanchard <anton@au1.ibm.com>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
> Cc: Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>
> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20130123062422.GC13720@us.ibm.com
> Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c | 13 +++----------
> include/linux/perf_event.h | 11 +++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

so this one started conflicting non-trivially with tip:perf/x86
- the pending memory profiling kernel-side bits.

Can we merge the memory profiling tooling side bits together
with the kernel side bits - or does it need more work?

For now I've excluded perf/x86 from tip:master until this is
resolved.

Thanks,

Ingo


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-02-01 13:21    [W:1.224 / U:0.004 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site