Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Date | Mon, 9 Dec 2013 18:09:22 -0800 | From | Paul Walmsley <> | Subject | [PATCH] thermal: ti-soc-thermal: clk_round_rate() can return a zero upon error |
| |
Treat both negative and zero return values from clk_round_rate() as errors. This is needed since subsequent patches will convert clk_round_rate()'s return value to be an unsigned type, rather than a signed type, since some clock sources can generate rates higher than (2^31)-1 Hz.
Eventually, when calling clk_round_rate(), only a return value of zero will be considered a error. All other values will be considered valid rates. The comparison against values less than 0 is kept to preserve the correct behavior in the meantime.
This patch also gets rid of a comparison between unsigned and signed values; a side-benefit.
Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley <pwalmsley@nvidia.com> Cc: Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@ti.com> Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> --- Applies on v3.13-rc3. See also:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=138542591313620&w=2
drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c b/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c index 74c0e3474d6e..8fe46dbc0c6f 100644 --- a/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c +++ b/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c @@ -1248,7 +1248,7 @@ int ti_bandgap_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) clk_rate = clk_round_rate(bgp->div_clk, bgp->conf->sensors[0].ts_data->max_freq); if (clk_rate < bgp->conf->sensors[0].ts_data->min_freq || - clk_rate == 0xffffffff) { + clk_rate <= 0) { ret = -ENODEV; dev_err(&pdev->dev, "wrong clock rate (%d)\n", clk_rate); goto put_clks;
| |