lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Dec]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4 3/6] ARM: at91/dt: define sama5d3 clocks
Date
On Monday 09 December 2013, boris brezillon wrote:
> > You are adding "clock-names" properties in a lot of cases. Are you sure you
> > are using the strings that are documented in the respective device bindings
> > for each name? In a lot of cases, drivers just want an anonymous clock
> > and we don't name them.
>
> I rechecked it, and almost all drivers call [devm_]clk_get with a
> specific clock
> name, and as a result we must specify the "clock-names" property.
> The only exceptions I found are the spi and PIT (Periodic Interval
> Timer) drivers,
> and "clock-names" property is not defined in these nodes.

Yes, I understood that the *drivers* use the names, but are they actually
documented in the device bindings? If not, it might be better to change the
drivers.

Arnd


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-12-09 17:01    [W:0.086 / U:0.060 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site