Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 9 Dec 2013 14:52:00 +0100 | From | Leif Lindholm <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 3/3] arm64: add EFI runtime services |
| |
Apologies for late feedback.
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 05:05:12PM -0500, Mark Salter wrote: > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..1bad8a7 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c > @@ -0,0 +1,507 @@ > +/* > + * Extensible Firmware Interface > + * > + * Based on Extensible Firmware Interface Specification version 2.3.1
Actually, for arm64, we're relying on UEFI 2.4 or later.
> + * > + * Copyright (C) 2013 Linaro Ltd.
And I'd say you've easily done enough here to motivate adding Red Hat.
> + * > + * Adapted for arm64 from arch/arm/kernel/efi.c code > + */ > + > +#include <linux/efi.h> > +#include <linux/export.h> > +#include <linux/memblock.h> > +#include <linux/of.h> > +#include <linux/of_fdt.h> > +#include <linux/sched.h> > +#include <linux/slab.h> > +#include <linux/bootmem.h> > + > +#include <asm/cacheflush.h> > +#include <asm/efi.h> > +#include <asm/tlbflush.h> > +#include <asm/mmu_context.h> > + > +#define efi_early_remap(a, b) \ > + ((__force void *)early_ioremap((a), (b)))
Do we not want early_memremap() here, rather than early_ioremap()?
/ Leif
| |