Messages in this thread | | | From | Tomasz Figa <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/4 v10] thermal: samsung: change base_common to more meaningful base_second | Date | Mon, 09 Dec 2013 13:48:13 +0100 |
| |
Hi Naveen,
On Tuesday 19 of November 2013 18:34:51 Naveen Krishna Chatradhi wrote: > On Exynos5440 and Exynos5420 there are registers common > across the TMU channels. > > To support that, we introduced a ADDRESS_MULTIPLE flag in the > driver and the 2nd set of register base and size are provided > in the "reg" property of the node. > > As per Amit's suggestion, this patch changes the base_common > to base_second and SHARED_MEMORY to ADDRESS_MULTIPLE. > > Signed-off-by: Naveen Krishna Chatradhi <ch.naveen@samsung.com> > Acked-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com> > Reviewed-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com> > --- > Changes since v9: > Just respinning > > Changes since v8: > None > .../devicetree/bindings/thermal/exynos-thermal.txt | 4 ++-- > drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c | 14 +++++++------- > drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.h | 4 ++-- > drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu_data.c | 2 +- > 4 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
Please see my comments inline.
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/exynos-thermal.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/exynos-thermal.txt > index 284f530..116cca0 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/exynos-thermal.txt > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/exynos-thermal.txt > @@ -11,8 +11,8 @@ > - reg : Address range of the thermal registers. For soc's which has multiple > instances of TMU and some registers are shared across all TMU's like > interrupt related then 2 set of register has to supplied. First set > - belongs to each instance of TMU and second set belongs to common TMU > - registers. > + belongs to each instance of TMU and second set belongs to second set > + of common TMU registers.
Just a wording issue, I think: If this is "second set of common TMU registers", then where is the first set of common TMU registers?
Otherwise the patch looks fine.
Best regards, Tomasz
| |