[lkml]   [2013]   [Dec]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: smp_call_function_single with wait=0 considered harmful
On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 02:43:03PM -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> smp_call_function_single() sets "csd = &__get_cpu_var(csd_data)", so
> it's not using a struct on the stack. We'll queue up "func" and
> likely will return before it is executed, but that should be fine
> because nobody will overwrite csd_data until it *is* executed and
> csd_unlock() has been called.

You're right, I missed the usage of the per-cpu data later in the

 \ /
  Last update: 2013-12-06 12:41    [W:0.060 / U:1.128 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site