lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Dec]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRE: [PATCH 1/2] usb: chipidea: fix mistake in device tree binding of nspire-usb to use vendor name 'lsi' instead of SoC name 'zevio'
Date


>
> Hi,
>
> On 05/12/2013, at 7:49 PM, Peter Chen <Peter.Chen@freescale.com> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 04:44:13PM +1100, Daniel Tang wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On 05/12/2013, at 12:44 AM, Peter Chen <Peter.Chen@freescale.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>> lsi is vendor name, what are zevio and nspire?
> >>> Usually, the compatible string should be "vendor_name,soc_name-
> module_name"
> >>>
> >>
> >> Because this port uses documentation from reverse engineering, it's
> difficult to work out what is SoC specific and what is device specific.
> The SoC is Zevio but the driver is written for the TI-Nspire.
> >>
> >
> > Please wrap the line to 80 characters.
> >
> > The driver is written for the TI-Nspire, and you port this driver for
> > SoC Zevio platform?
>
> The TI-Nspire runs on the Zevio SoC.
>
> > Since you use chipidea ip, we don't care the usb
> > module name at your platform, we only care the soc name which you are
> > running, it can detect the SoC platform at runtime.
> >
>
> Yep, that's why the latest patch I sent in renames the device tree
> binding to "lsi,zevio-usb" since zevio is the name of the SoC that the
> TI-Nspire uses.
>
> > At your dts patch, it still uses nspire-usb.
> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-usb&m=138614886720024&w=2
>
> I'll send a new one in right now.

OK, in order to avoid changing name again, I will queue your patch at my pending
chipidea tree until your dts has applied by arch or dts maintainer, notify me
when they are ready.

Peter





\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-12-06 04:21    [W:0.052 / U:2.572 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site