Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 5 Dec 2013 17:21:50 -0500 (EST) | From | Alan Stern <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/5] PM: Enable option of re-use runtime PM callbacks at system suspend |
| |
On Thu, 5 Dec 2013, Len Brown wrote:
> This thread raises the question... > > Do we still need to have PM_RUNTIME apart from PM_SLEEP? > > What is the benefit of being able to build-in one one without the other? > If that benefit is not significant, perhaps the time has come to > replace them both with CONFIG_PM...
There are lots of embedded/SoC platforms that implement PM_RUNTIME but not PM_SLEEP.
Alan Stern
| |