Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Thu, 5 Dec 2013 19:16:20 +0100 | From | Oleg Nesterov <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] introduce for_each_thread() to replace the buggy while_each_thread() |
| |
On 12/04, David Rientjes wrote: > > Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Thanks!
> Minor: should the definitions of thread_{head,node} be annotated with > __rcu for users of CONFIG_SPARSE_RCU_POINTER?
Perhaps. And perhaps task_struct->tasks. And perhaps we should add rcu_read_lock_held() || lockdep_is_held(tasklist) || lockdep_is_held(siglock) into for_each_process/thead.
But lets do this later. At least we should avoid the false positives.
Oleg.
|  |