lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Dec]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 28/28] perf tools: Add udis86 disassembler feature check
On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 11:45:46AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:

SNIP

> > >
> > > 1)
> > >
> > > So, the first problem I can see is in the output:
> > >
> > > Auto-detecting system features:
> > > ... backtrace: [ on ]
> > > ... dwarf: [ on ]
> > > ... fortify-source: [ on ]
> > > ... glibc: [ on ]
> > > ... gtk2: [ on ]
> > > ... gtk2-infobar: [ on ]
> > > ... libaudit: [ on ]
> > > ... libbfd: [ on ]
> > > ... libelf: [ on ]
> > > ... libelf-getphdrnum: [ on ]
> > > ... libelf-mmap: [ on ]
> > > ... libnuma: [ on ]
> > > ... libperl: [ on ]
> > > ... libpython: [ on ]
> > > ... libpython-version: [ on ]
> > > ... libslang: [ on ]
> > > ... libunwind: [ on ]
> > > ... on-exit: [ on ]
> > > ... stackprotector-all: [ on ]
> > > ... timerfd: [ on ]
> > >
> > > config/Makefile:421: No udis86 support.
> > >
> > > such a 'no XYZ support' message should only occur if a feature test
> > > failed. _If_ we decide that 'udis86' support is required for a full
> > > perf build then there should be a new line saying something like:
> > >
> > > ... udis86: [ OFF ]
> >
> > hum, just sent v4 that added udis86 into above list ;-)
> >
> > So.. do we consider 'full perf build' to be build with all
> > possible libraries linked in?
>
> So my worry is, how widely is libudis86 available in distros? What is
> the package name on Debian/Ubuntu for example?

I did not find any.. :-\ I can see Fedora and Gentoo

thanks,
jirka


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-12-05 14:41    [W:0.062 / U:0.376 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site