Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 5 Dec 2013 14:02:20 +0100 | From | Jiri Olsa <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 28/28] perf tools: Add udis86 disassembler feature check |
| |
On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 11:45:46AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
SNIP
> > > > > > 1) > > > > > > So, the first problem I can see is in the output: > > > > > > Auto-detecting system features: > > > ... backtrace: [ on ] > > > ... dwarf: [ on ] > > > ... fortify-source: [ on ] > > > ... glibc: [ on ] > > > ... gtk2: [ on ] > > > ... gtk2-infobar: [ on ] > > > ... libaudit: [ on ] > > > ... libbfd: [ on ] > > > ... libelf: [ on ] > > > ... libelf-getphdrnum: [ on ] > > > ... libelf-mmap: [ on ] > > > ... libnuma: [ on ] > > > ... libperl: [ on ] > > > ... libpython: [ on ] > > > ... libpython-version: [ on ] > > > ... libslang: [ on ] > > > ... libunwind: [ on ] > > > ... on-exit: [ on ] > > > ... stackprotector-all: [ on ] > > > ... timerfd: [ on ] > > > > > > config/Makefile:421: No udis86 support. > > > > > > such a 'no XYZ support' message should only occur if a feature test > > > failed. _If_ we decide that 'udis86' support is required for a full > > > perf build then there should be a new line saying something like: > > > > > > ... udis86: [ OFF ] > > > > hum, just sent v4 that added udis86 into above list ;-) > > > > So.. do we consider 'full perf build' to be build with all > > possible libraries linked in? > > So my worry is, how widely is libudis86 available in distros? What is > the package name on Debian/Ubuntu for example?
I did not find any.. :-\ I can see Fedora and Gentoo
thanks, jirka
| |