lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Dec]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Subject[PATCH V2 0/2] ARM: OMAP2+/dts: standardize SoC naming
Date
Originally attempted partially in [1], the missing binding were
reported as part of Rob's report in [2].

So, here is take two of the series, lacking an standard causes issues
that was fixed such as [3]. Ideally, we should never again introduce a
board file without a exact compatible SoC match.

I have stayed a bit away from updating board and SoC dts files yet
to look at the direction we'd like to go here. If we feel things are
good, I would gladly try to clean our mess up.

Nishanth Menon (2):
Documentation: dt: OMAP: explicitly state SoC compatible strings
ARM: OMAP2+: board-generic: update SoC compatibility strings

.../devicetree/bindings/arm/omap/omap.txt | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++
arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-generic.c | 7 +++
2 files changed, 60 insertions(+)

[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2998201/
[2] http://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=138378029113665&w=2
[3] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/3279281/

--
1.7.9.5



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-12-05 02:41    [W:0.063 / U:2.740 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site