Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 04 Dec 2013 22:30:06 +0800 | From | Hanjun Guo <> | Subject | Re: [RFC part1 PATCH 4/7] ARM64 / ACPI: Introduce the skeleton of _PDC related for ARM64 |
| |
On 2013年12月04日 01:12, Rob Herring wrote: > On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 10:36 AM, Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> wrote: [...] > +#ifndef _ASM_ARM_ACPI_H > +#define _ASM_ARM_ACPI_H > + > +static inline bool arch_has_acpi_pdc(void) > +{ > + return false; /* always false for now */ > +} > + > +static inline void arch_acpi_set_pdc_bits(u32 *buf) > +{ > + return; > +} > + > +#endif /*_ASM_ARM_ACPI_H*/ > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h > index 45b20cd..73b1d3a 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h > @@ -162,6 +162,17 @@ static inline void spin_lock_prefetch(const void *x) > > #define HAVE_ARCH_PICK_MMAP_LAYOUT > > +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI > The ifdef is not necessary.
Good catch, will fix it in next version.
Thanks for the comments.
Hanjun
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |