[lkml]   [2013]   [Dec]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH RFC] mm readahead: Fix the readahead fail in case of empty numa node
On 12/04/2013 02:11 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 04 Dec 2013 14:00:09 +0530 Raghavendra K T <> wrote:
>> Unfaortunately, from my search, I saw that the code belonged to pre git
>> time, so could not get much information on that.
> Here:
> It seems it was done as a rather thoughtless performance optimisation.
> I'd say it's time to reimplement max_sane_readahead() from scratch.

Ok. Thanks for the link. I think after that,
Here it was changed to pernode: to avoid iteration all over.

do you think above patch (+comments) with some sanitized nr (thus
avoiding iteration over nodes in remote numa readahead case) does look
or should we iterate all memory.

 \ /
  Last update: 2013-12-04 10:21    [W:0.068 / U:2.100 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site