lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Dec]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC part1 PATCH 3/7] ACPI / processor_core: Rework _PDC related stuff to make it more arch-independent
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 04:51:40PM +0000, One Thousand Gnomes wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Dec 2013 00:36:47 +0800
> Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> > _PDC related stuff in processor_core.c is little bit X86/IA64 dependent,
> > rework the code to make it more arch-independent.
> >
> > The return value of acpi_processor_eval_pdc() should be 'acpi_status' but
> > defined as 'int', fix it too.
>
> Why not just define boot_options_idle_override as well. Then you can
> leave the code unchanged. Also more importantly you can have override
> values for ARM when it turns out you need those too and the logic will be
> the same for both processor families

The arguments to _PDC are architecture specific, so there do need to be
code changes here.

--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-12-03 18:21    [W:0.077 / U:0.160 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site