lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Dec]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH V6 2/2] arm64: perf: add support for percpu pmu interrupt
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 11:49:11AM +0000, Vinayak Kale wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 09:34:03AM +0000, Vinayak Kale wrote:
> >> Add support for irq registration when pmu interrupt is percpu.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Vinayak Kale <vkale@apm.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Tuan Phan <tphan@apm.com>
> >> ---
> >> arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c | 116 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> >> 1 file changed, 86 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
> >> index cea1594..d2d562f 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
> >> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
> >> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
> >>
> >> #include <linux/bitmap.h>
> >> #include <linux/interrupt.h>
> >> +#include <linux/irq.h>
> >> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> >> #include <linux/export.h>
> >> #include <linux/perf_event.h>
> >> @@ -363,26 +364,61 @@ validate_group(struct perf_event *event)
> >> }
> >>
> >> static void
> >> +armpmu_disable_percpu_irq(void *data)
> >> +{
> >> + struct arm_pmu *armpmu = data;
> >> + struct platform_device *pmu_device = armpmu->plat_device;
> >> + int irq = platform_get_irq(pmu_device, 0);
> >> +
> >> + cpumask_test_and_clear_cpu(smp_processor_id(), &armpmu->active_irqs);
> >> + disable_percpu_irq(irq);
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static void
> >> armpmu_release_hardware(struct arm_pmu *armpmu)
> >> {
> >> - int i, irq, irqs;
> >> + int irq;
> >
> > Why did you not make this unsigned, like I suggested?
>
> Suggestion was to make 'irqs' variable unsigned and modify the check
> for 'irqs' to if (!irqs).
> This patch incorporates that suggestion.
>
> We have to keep 'irq' signed only. 'platform_get_irq()' can return error value.

Damn, yes, I see the issue there. Ok, I'll go back and take another look at
your patch...

Will


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-12-03 15:21    [W:0.046 / U:0.104 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site