lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Dec]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] rcu: Eliminate softirq processing from rcutree
From
Date
On Tue, 2013-12-24 at 23:55 -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: 
> On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 04:07:34AM +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:

> > > So which code do you think deserves the big lump of coal? ;-)
> >
> > Sebastian's NO_HZ_FULL locking fixes. Locking is hard, and rt sure
> > doesn't make it any easier, so lets give him a cookie or three to nibble
> > on while he ponders that trylock stuff again instead :)
>
> Fair enough. Does Sebastian prefer milk and cookies or the other
> tradition of beer and a cigar? ;-)

Having sufficiently recovered from turkey overdose to be able to slither
upstairs (bump bump bump) to check on the box, commenting..

# timers-do-not-raise-softirq-unconditionally.patch
# rtmutex-use-a-trylock-for-waiter-lock-in-trylock.patch

..those two out does seem to have stabilized the thing.

Merry Christmasss,

-Mike



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-12-25 19:01    [W:0.129 / U:2.200 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site