lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Dec]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Perf: Correct Assumptions about Sample Timestamps in Passes
On 12/20/13, 5:27 AM, Joseph Schuchart wrote:
> I know this comes late, but: As far as I can see, your change does not
> preserve the logic of the code I suggested. The idea was to first gather
> all the maximum timestamps of all cpus (that is, the last timestamp seen
> on each cpu) and then determine the minimum of these maxima. These are
> two distinct steps that I think cannot be combined in one update. Your

A number of people have reported similar problems -- timestamps below
last flush time. This approach would solve that problem for data
processed from files, so it would be a good improvement.

David


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-12-20 19:01    [W:0.885 / U:0.020 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site