Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 2 Dec 2013 09:28:02 +0100 | From | Nicolas Ferre <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] rtc: rtc-at91rm9200: Corrected alarm over day/month wrap: |
| |
On 18/11/2013 23:37, Andrew Morton : > On Mon, 18 Nov 2013 18:20:54 +0100 Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com> wrote: > >> From: Linus Pizunski <linus@narrativeteam.com> >> >> Update month and day of month to the alarm month/day instead >> of current day/month when setting the RTC alarm mask. >> >> Signed-off-by: Linus Pizunski <linus@narrativeteam.com> >> Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com> > > I changed this to signed-off-by, as you were on the patch delivery path. > >> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-at91rm9200.c >> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-at91rm9200.c >> @@ -220,6 +220,8 @@ static int at91_rtc_setalarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *alrm) >> >> at91_alarm_year = tm.tm_year; >> >> + tm.tm_mon = alrm->time.tm_mon; >> + tm.tm_mday = alrm->time.tm_mday; >> tm.tm_hour = alrm->time.tm_hour; >> tm.tm_min = alrm->time.tm_min; >> tm.tm_sec = alrm->time.tm_sec; > > I queued this for 3.13. Do we think it warrants a -stable backport?
(I am late, but it seems this one is not sent to Linus yet...)
Well, yes, we can tag this one for "-stable". The patch applies on nearly each kernel that I can think about (code is from 2.6.17-ish). But this patch applies with an offset...
Best regards, -- Nicolas Ferre
| |