Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 18 Dec 2013 08:55:23 -0800 | Subject | Re: [PATCH] dma: mv_xor: remove mv_desc_get_dest_addr() | From | Dan Williams <> |
| |
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 7:40 AM, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 11:00:05PM -0800, Dan Williams wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 1:10 AM, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> wrote: >> > On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 3:14 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux >> > <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote: >> >> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 03:43:31PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 11:50:35PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: >> >>> > On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 11:27:06AM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote: >> >>> > > + Dan >> >>> > > >> >>> > > On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 07:39:25PM +0000, Jason Cooper wrote: >> >>> > > > The following commit: >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > > 54f8d501e842 dmaengine: remove DMA unmap from drivers >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > > removed the last caller to mv_desc_get_dest_addr(), creating the >> >>> > > > warning: >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > > drivers/dma/mv_xor.c:57:12: warning: 'mv_desc_get_dest_addr' defined >> >>> > > > but not used [-Wunused-function] >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > > Remove it. >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > > Signed-off-by: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net> >> >>> > > Acked-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com> >> >>> > > >> >>> > > This should go thru Dan's tree >> >>> > >> >>> > So what's happening with this patch? I don't see it in -rc yet. >> >>> Dan has applied this to his next. So this should show us in next rc1 >> >> >> >> Wrong answer. This is a compile regression introduced in the last merge >> >> window, it should be going into an -rc kernel. >> > >> > Vinod, if your fixes branch is ready I'll take it along with the rest >> > of the regression fixes to Linus. > Sorry I wasnt well last week, so I just managed to send the PULL on friday > morning. Wasnt sure if Linus will cut rc on friday or later, so sent it!
Ok, glad you are feeling better.
>> >> Ok, I see you sent dma-slave/fixes up, I'll follow up with the rest: > Okay, did you manage to send it? If not I may have few (i think at least 1 more) >
Patchwork id(s)? I want to send it it today.
I was busy tracking down a data corruption report with net_dma.
-- Dan
| |