Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 18 Dec 2013 16:41:35 +0530 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] cpufreq: tegra: Re-model Tegra cpufreq driver | From | Viresh Kumar <> |
| |
On 17 December 2013 16:22, bilhuang <bilhuang@nvidia.com> wrote: > Tegra20 DVFS is a little bit complicated due to the fact that we can't scale > VDD_CPU directly, there are constraints or relationship to other power rails > so I don't think it is a good idea to use generic cpufreq-cpu0 driver if > we're going to support voltage scaling.
But why can't we handle that in a CPU specific regulator code?
| |