Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 16 Dec 2013 11:39:55 -0500 | From | Santosh Shilimkar <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/2] gpio: davinci: reuse for keystone arch |
| |
On Monday 16 December 2013 10:09 AM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: > On Sunday 15 December 2013 08:50 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote: >> On Sunday 15 December 2013 12:41 AM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: >>> Linus, Sekhar, >>> >>> On Thursday 12 December 2013 01:12 PM, Grygorii Strashko wrote: >>>> This series is intended to update Davinci GPIO driver and reuse >>>> it for Keystone SoCs, because Keystone uses the similar GPIO IP like Davinci. >>>> Keystone GPIO IP: supports: >>>> - up to 32 GPIO lines; >>>> - only unbanked irqs; >>>> >>>> See Documentation: >>>> Keystone - http://www.ti.com/lit/ug/sprugv1/sprugv1.pdf >>>> >>>> This series depends on: >>>> [1] "[PATCH 1/2] gpio: davinci: Fix a check for unbanked gpio" >>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/8/22 >>>> [2] "[PATCH v6 0/6] gpio: daVinci: cleanup and feature enhancement" >>>> https://www.mail-archive.com/devicetree@vger.kernel.org/msg05970.html >>>> [3] "gpio: davinci: get rid of DAVINCI_N_GPIO" >>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/26/405 >>>> [4] "gpio: introduce GPIO_DAVINCI kconfig option" >>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/26/435 >>>> [5] "gpio: davinci: use chained_irq_enter/chained_irq_exit API" >>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/26/428 >>>> >>>> To handle all dependencies, I've created a branch where I collected all >>>> "ready to merge" patches (all acks added in patches) and this series: >>>> - https://github.com/grygoriyS/linux.git >>>> - branch: keystone-master-gpio-for-next >>>> >>> Can one of you pull all these patches ? >> >> So I went through my backlog and queued all that I think is ready. Here >> is the branch. Let me know if there is anything else missing. >> > The $subject series (2 patches) don't seems to be on your branch. > Ofcourse Linus needs to ack them before they can be considered. I have couple of comments as well so refresh of the series would be needed.
Linus, Can you also please look at them.
Regards, Santosh
| |