Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 13 Dec 2013 07:24:06 +0100 | From | Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2] kernel/locking: mutex: simplify access to the first entry in the wait-list |
| |
Hello Ingo & Peter,
I added Greg on Cc.
W dniu 12.12.2013 13:52, Peter Zijlstra pisze: > On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 09:02:07PM +0900, Kyungmin Park wrote: >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Peter Zijlstra [mailto:peterz@infradead.org] >>> Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2013 8:35 PM >>> To: Andrzej Pietrasiewicz >>> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Kyungmin Park; Marek Szyprowski; Ingo >>> Molnar >>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] kernel/locking: mutex: simplify access to the >>> first entry in the wait-list >>> >>> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 12:29:32PM +0100, Andrzej Pietrasiewicz wrote: >>>> Use list_first_entry instead of explicitly accessing the first entry >>>> with "head".next. The comment one line above becomes obsolete. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzej.p@samsung.com> >>>> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com> >>>> ---
For quite a long time I've been sending the same SOB lines to the linux-usb list.
Can you please refer here:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-usb/msg74981.html
>>>> >>>> v1..v2: >>>> >>>> - corrected the email address in the second Signed-off-by line >>> >>> Still invalid; the problem is that you appear to have written the patch >>> (you send it and you have first sob). >> >> >>> So what is Kyungmin doing in the line? He did not send me your patch. >> >> Internal review process, and it represents this patch comes from. > > For review we have this specific tag, oddly called: 'Reviewed-by'. >
| |