lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Dec]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2] kernel/locking: mutex: simplify access to the first entry in the wait-list
Hello Ingo & Peter,

I added Greg on Cc.

W dniu 12.12.2013 13:52, Peter Zijlstra pisze:
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 09:02:07PM +0900, Kyungmin Park wrote:
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Peter Zijlstra [mailto:peterz@infradead.org]
>>> Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2013 8:35 PM
>>> To: Andrzej Pietrasiewicz
>>> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Kyungmin Park; Marek Szyprowski; Ingo
>>> Molnar
>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] kernel/locking: mutex: simplify access to the
>>> first entry in the wait-list
>>>
>>> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 12:29:32PM +0100, Andrzej Pietrasiewicz wrote:
>>>> Use list_first_entry instead of explicitly accessing the first entry
>>>> with "head".next. The comment one line above becomes obsolete.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzej.p@samsung.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
>>>> ---

For quite a long time I've been sending the same SOB lines to the
linux-usb list.

Can you please refer here:

http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-usb/msg74981.html


>>>>
>>>> v1..v2:
>>>>
>>>> - corrected the email address in the second Signed-off-by line
>>>
>>> Still invalid; the problem is that you appear to have written the patch
>>> (you send it and you have first sob).
>>
>>
>>> So what is Kyungmin doing in the line? He did not send me your patch.
>>
>> Internal review process, and it represents this patch comes from.
>
> For review we have this specific tag, oddly called: 'Reviewed-by'.
>


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-12-13 08:01    [W:0.089 / U:0.668 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site