lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Dec]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH 4/5] timekeeping: Fix CLOCK_TAI timer/nanosleep delays

* John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> wrote:

> > If the bugs extend to more than this two-liner then for -stable it
> > might be better to just disable CLOCK_TAI (userspace can deal with
> > it just fine), and queue up the right fixes for the next merge
> > window or so.
>
> I don't foresee further issues (famous last words, eh), but since I
> was planning on keeping patch #4 and #5 for 3.14 anyway, we can wait
> till those land upstream to decide if the two-liner is sufficient or
> if disabling CLOCK_TAI in older -stable kernels is the right
> approach. That sound ok?

Yeah, that certainly sounds good to me.

Thanks,

Ingo


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-12-13 16:01    [W:0.289 / U:0.036 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site