Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 13 Dec 2013 14:48:41 +0300 | From | Dan Carpenter <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/9] Known exploit detection |
| |
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 11:31:48AM +0100, Alexander Holler wrote: > I've never seen a comment inside the kernel sources which does point > to a CVE, so I assume there already does exists some agreement about > not doing so.
We do occasionally put CVE numbers in the commit message, but normally the commit comes first before we ask for a CVE number.
If you want a list of kernel CVEs then you can use the Ubuntu list: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu-cve-tracker http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/main.html It has the commit which introduced the bug and commit which fixes the bug. Suse has a public CVE list as well.
You are right that probably some security commits don't get a CVE. When you spot one then feel free to ask for a CVE from the oss-security@lists.openwall.com email list.
regards, dan carpenter
| |