lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Dec]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 10/12] sched/numa: fix record hinting faults check
On Sun, Dec 08, 2013 at 02:14:51PM +0800, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> Adjust numa_scan_period in task_numa_placement, depending on how much useful
> work the numa code can do. The local faults and remote faults should be used
> to check if there is record hinting faults instead of local faults and shared
> faults. This patch fix it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <liwanp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Looks good to me.

Reviewed-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>

> ---
> kernel/sched/fair.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index b077f1b3..942e67b 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -1322,7 +1322,7 @@ static void update_task_scan_period(struct task_struct *p,
> * completely idle or all activity is areas that are not of interest
> * to automatic numa balancing. Scan slower
> */
> - if (local + shared == 0) {
> + if (local + remote == 0) {
> p->numa_scan_period = min(p->numa_scan_period_max,
> p->numa_scan_period << 1);
>
> --
> 1.7.5.4
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
>


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-12-10 09:21    [W:0.116 / U:0.128 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site