Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 10 Dec 2013 02:01:09 -0500 | From | Naoya Horiguchi <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 10/12] sched/numa: fix record hinting faults check |
| |
On Sun, Dec 08, 2013 at 02:14:51PM +0800, Wanpeng Li wrote: > Adjust numa_scan_period in task_numa_placement, depending on how much useful > work the numa code can do. The local faults and remote faults should be used > to check if there is record hinting faults instead of local faults and shared > faults. This patch fix it. > > Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <liwanp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
> --- > kernel/sched/fair.c | 2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c > index b077f1b3..942e67b 100644 > --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c > +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c > @@ -1322,7 +1322,7 @@ static void update_task_scan_period(struct task_struct *p, > * completely idle or all activity is areas that are not of interest > * to automatic numa balancing. Scan slower > */ > - if (local + shared == 0) { > + if (local + remote == 0) { > p->numa_scan_period = min(p->numa_scan_period_max, > p->numa_scan_period << 1); > > -- > 1.7.5.4 > > -- > To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in > the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, > see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . > Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a> >
| |