Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 10 Dec 2013 19:31:34 +0100 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 13/41] percpu: Add raw_cpu_ops |
| |
* Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Dec 2013, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > Yeah, trying to figure out which should go through which tree. > > > Christoph, should I also pickup 14? Or can that go through x86? > > > > Well, it appears to have dependencies so I doubt it can be kept > > separate. In any case, provided all debugging is properly productized: > > 13/14 can be just merged. There are no dependencies on earlier > patches. > > If you want to merge 18 then you would need to pick up also 15-17.
So I'm referring to the 'This is required' wording here:
| Subject: [PATCH 14/41] x86: Rename __this_cpu_xxx_# operations to raw_cpu_xxx_# | | This is required now since the core portion expects a different | naming. | | Change the names from __this_cpu_xxxx_# to raw_cpu_xxxx_#. | | Also changes the uses of the x86 percpu primitives in preempt.h. | | This is required now since the core portion expects a different naming.
By what is this required - by the previous patch #13?
Also, the changelog indicates it's two changes - please split the patch in two if so.
(Tejun, please wait for this review to be complete before committing anything.)
Thanks,
Ingo
| |