lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Dec]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 13/41] percpu: Add raw_cpu_ops

* Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 10 Dec 2013, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> > > Yeah, trying to figure out which should go through which tree.
> > > Christoph, should I also pickup 14? Or can that go through x86?
> >
> > Well, it appears to have dependencies so I doubt it can be kept
> > separate. In any case, provided all debugging is properly productized:
>
> 13/14 can be just merged. There are no dependencies on earlier
> patches.
>
> If you want to merge 18 then you would need to pick up also 15-17.

So I'm referring to the 'This is required' wording here:

| Subject: [PATCH 14/41] x86: Rename __this_cpu_xxx_# operations to raw_cpu_xxx_#
|
| This is required now since the core portion expects a different
| naming.
|
| Change the names from __this_cpu_xxxx_# to raw_cpu_xxxx_#.
|
| Also changes the uses of the x86 percpu primitives in preempt.h.
|
| This is required now since the core portion expects a different naming.


By what is this required - by the previous patch #13?

Also, the changelog indicates it's two changes - please split the
patch in two if so.

(Tejun, please wait for this review to be complete before committing
anything.)

Thanks,

Ingo


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-12-10 20:21    [W:0.326 / U:0.136 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site