Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 10 Dec 2013 16:55:46 +0100 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 13/41] percpu: Add raw_cpu_ops |
| |
* Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 04:45:06PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > * Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 05:32:45PM -0600, Christoph Lameter wrote: > > > > The patches following this one will add preemption checks to __this_cpu > > > > ops so we need to have an alternative way to use this_cpu operations > > > > without preemption checks. > > > > > > > > raw_cpu_ops will be the basis for all other ops since these will be the > > > > operations that do not implement any checks. > > > > > > > > Primitive operations are renamed by this patch from __this_cpu_xxx to > > > > raw_cpu_xxxx. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> > > > > > > Applied to percpu/for-3.14. > > > > Please also pick up the related debugging bits: > > > > [PATCH 18/41] percpu: Add preemption checks to __this_cpu ops > > > > as we don't want to expand percpu ops without doing proper debugging. > > Yeah, trying to figure out which should go through which tree. > Christoph, should I also pickup 14? Or can that go through x86?
Well, it appears to have dependencies so I doubt it can be kept separate. In any case, provided all debugging is properly productized:
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Thanks,
Ingo
| |