Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 10 Dec 2013 12:26:04 +0100 | From | Miroslav Lichvar <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH RFC] timekeeping: Fix clock stability with nohz |
| |
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 11:20:51AM +0100, Miroslav Lichvar wrote: > What does the following line from your patch mean? > > tick_error -= tk->xtime_interval;
Ok, I think I understand how it should work. There are two loops, the bigadjust one is correcting only for ntp tick length and the other for the cumulative error. I think it might work better if they were both active at the same time instead of switching between them according to the current ntp error.
-- Miroslav Lichvar
| |