lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Dec]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 04/16] wl1251: implement hardware ARP filtering
Hi!

> Update hardware ARP filter configuration on BSS_CHANGED_ARP_FILTER
> notification from mac80211.
> Ported from wl1271 driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Gnedt <david.gnedt@davizone.at>
> Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/ti/wl1251/acx.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/net/wireless/ti/wl1251/acx.h | 15 +++++++++++++++
> drivers/net/wireless/ti/wl1251/main.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 53 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wl1251/acx.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wl1251/acx.c
> index cce50e2..5f4a552 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wl1251/acx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wl1251/acx.c
> @@ -1062,6 +1062,32 @@ out:
> return ret;
> }
>
> +int wl1251_acx_arp_ip_filter(struct wl1251 *wl, bool enable, __be32 address)
> +{
> + struct wl1251_acx_arp_filter *acx;
> + int ret;

Is it good idea to use be32 for IP address? AFAICT IPv4 addresses
really don't have edianity. Perhaps u32 is better?

> + if (enable)
> + memcpy(acx->address, &address, ACX_IPV4_ADDR_SIZE);

acx->address is an array of u8, so no endianity there, either.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-12-10 11:41    [W:0.363 / U:0.432 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site