Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Sat, 9 Nov 2013 16:23:13 +0100 | From | Oleg Nesterov <> | Subject | Re: [PATCHSET 00/13] tracing/uprobes: Add support for more fetch methods (v6) |
| |
On 11/09, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > > In that case, I suggest you to use "@+addr" for the relative address, > since that is an offset, isn't that? :)
Agreed, @+addr looks better!
> BTW, it seems that @addr syntax is hard to use for uprobes, because > current uprobes is based on a binary, not a process, we cannot specify > which process is probed when we define it.
Yes, exactly. That is why we suggest that user-space should pass the ip-relative address (actually offset). This should hopefully solve all problems with relocations.
Oleg.
|  |