[lkml]   [2013]   [Nov]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCHSET 00/13] tracing/uprobes: Add support for more fetch methods (v6)
On 11/09, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> In that case, I suggest you to use "@+addr" for the relative address,
> since that is an offset, isn't that? :)

Agreed, @+addr looks better!

> BTW, it seems that @addr syntax is hard to use for uprobes, because
> current uprobes is based on a binary, not a process, we cannot specify
> which process is probed when we define it.

Yes, exactly. That is why we suggest that user-space should pass the
ip-relative address (actually offset). This should hopefully solve all
problems with relocations.


 \ /
  Last update: 2013-11-09 16:41    [W:0.334 / U:0.072 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site